Thursday

Dueling court actions snarl criminal case against Jeremy Johnson

Dueling court actions snarl criminal case against Jeremy Johnson
Indictment • Co-defendants plead not guilty as sides scrap over witnesses for the Utah case and an FTC lawsuit.
By Tom Harvey The Salt Lake Tribune
Published April 11, 2013 7:41 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
     
Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment
Read All Comments
Entanglements with a civil lawsuit in Las Vegas are threatening to throw a wrench into a criminal case in Salt Lake City involving St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson and four former coworkers at Johnson's online marketing company.
The dispute over shared witnesses in the Federal Trade Commission lawsuit in Nevada and the Utah case bubbled up in court Wednesday. At the hearing, Johnson and the codefendants pleaded not guilty to 86 criminal charges related to their operation of Johnson's I Works company.
Johnson, Bryce Payne, Scott Leavitt, Ryan Riddle and Loyd Johnston each answered "not guilty" when U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Warner asked them how they pleaded to charges allegedly revolving around bank fraud that were handed up in a grand jury indictment last month.
Both sides said the complications of having two different cases running simultaneously in the two cities threatened to undermine the potential testimony of witnesses in the criminal case.
Johnson and his I Works company, along with the four associates and related entities, were sued by the Federal Trade Commission in the civil case in December 2010. The agency said they allegedly misled consumers to buy information on make-money schemes, stay-healthy programs and on how to obtain government and private grants for personal expenses.
Consumers who gave credit- or debit-card numbers for a minimal handling charge, usually $1.99, were then charged monthly fees of $59.95, and some faced a one-time fee of $189, according to the suit.
Hundreds of thousands of customers sought refunds from credit-card companies over the charges, the suit said. When Visa and MasterCard terminated I Works' merchant accounts, the complaint says Johnson and the others created dozens of shell companies in order to continue to accept card payments.
It's those shell companies that are a key part of the government's criminal case in Salt Lake City, which has been entwined from the beginning with the FTC lawsuit in Las Vegas.
On Wednesday, Johnson's criminal defense attorney, Ron Yengich, told Judge Warner that prosecutors from Salt Lake City were sitting in on depositions being conducted by FTC attorneys of witnesses in the civil lawsuit and consulting amongst themselves during breaks.
"It puts every one of these defendants in jeopardy," Yengich said.
Attorney Marcus Mumford, who represents Leavitt, complained that prosecutors had failed to meet a court-ordered deadline for turning over witness statements that Mumford said were important to his client who is also facing a deposition in the lawsuit and needs the information to prepare.
"He doesn't want to take the Fifth" and refuse to answer questions, Mumford said.
Prosecutors have asked Warner to back off his earlier decision to require the quick release of witness statements and said they now fear that Johnson, who represents himself in the lawsuit, is trying to use depositions to influence witnesses in the criminal case.
"There is a potential threat that witnesses will be improperly influenced," prosecutors told Warner in a motion.
But another attorney for Johnson, Chelsea Koch, shot back that "the government clearly wants a tactical advantage, making its claims of inappropriate conduct on the part of the defense absurd."
Warner in effect threw up his hands Wednesday and told both sides that he did not have jurisdiction over the lawsuit in Las Vegas. He suggested defense attorneys seek a stay of that case. He set the next hearing in the criminal case for June 13.
The criminal charges revolve around a series of what the government alleges were shell companies the five defendants set up in order to fool banks into creating new accounts so I Works could continue to charge consumers' credit and debit cards.
Johnson previously had been charged with one count of mail fraud connected to I Works, but the government sought the new indictment with additional defendants after Johnson changed his mind and declined to plead guilty as part of an agreement that could have gotten him 11 years in prison.
Johnson has previously said the FTC allegations and the initial criminal charge he faced were baseless.
Johnson in recent months also has made public copies of emails and a transcript of a 2010 meeting he had with then-Utah Chief Deputy Attorney General John Swallow that Johnson says details Swallow's involvement in a purported plan to bribe U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to stifle the FTC investigation of I Works.
Swallow, who was elected attorney general in November, and Reid's office have denied any knowledge of such a plan. Swallow said he merely connected Johnson with payday loan entrepreneur Richard Rawle to use Rawle's experience to hire lobbyists who would help Johnson.
The U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI are investigating Swallow on that and other matters.
Twitter: TomHarveySltrib

Swallow probe issues 3 more subpoenas; one to Jeremy Johnson

Swallow probe issues 3 more subpoenas; one to Jeremy Johnson
Probe • The other goes to Mark Shurtleff's "fixer."
By Robert Gehrke The Salt Lake Tribune
Published November 12, 2013 9:16 pm
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
     
Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment
Read All Comments
House investigators issued three more subpoenas Tuesday — one each to Jeremy Johnson, Tim Lawson and a payday-loan chain — all key players in the saga involving Utah Attorney General John Swallow and his predecessor, Mark Shurtleff.
Johnson, founder of the defunct I Works, spawned a series of investigations in January when he told The Salt Lake Tribune that Swallow arranged a deal to help the St. George businessman, who was under federal investigation.
At the time, Johnson said he had made a $250,000 payment to Swallow's former boss, Richard Rawle, founder of the Provo-based Check City payday-loan chain, which Johnson alleged was intended to bribe Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
Swallow and Rawle, who has since died, said the money was to hire lobbyists to help Johnson with the Federal Trade Commission investigation he was facing.
Swallow and Reid have denied wrongdoing.
The House investigators are looking for any financial transactions between Johnson and Swallow, communication between the two, trips paid for by Johnson, and Johnson's communication about processing online-poker payments.
Johnson and online-poker interests asked Swallow and Shurtleff to sign off on the legality of processing payments in 2010, but they declined.
A subpoena also went to Tosh Inc., the parent company for Check City, for documents relating to Swallow, Reid, Johnson and payday-loan lobbyists, among others.
The final new subpoena orders Lawson, a longtime friend of Shurtleff, to provide records about fundraising activities with Swallow, trips taken with the attorney general and any documents relating to Marc Sessions Jenson, an imprisoned businessman who said he hired Lawson to help him out of criminal charges filed by the attorney general's office.
Lawson, sometimes dubbed Shurtleff's "fixer," worked with Swallow on the former GOP attorney general's campaign.
The three subpoenas bring the total issued by the House investigative committee to 15. Last week, the bipartisan panel issued nine subpoenas, most of them focused on unraveling Swallow's campaign money trail.
Softwise, a company owned by Rawle's son, has not complied with the House directive and has asked a judge to quash the order, saying the House is overstepping its legislative authority and is on a "fishing expedition."
The House committee, comprising five Republicans and four Democrats, is investigating a series of allegations against Swallow in a probe that could lay the groundwork for impeachment proceedings against the first-year Republican attorney general.
Twitter: @RobertGehrke

Judge won't delay Jeremy Johnson case in Nevada

Judge won't delay Jeremy Johnson case in Nevada
The Salt Lake Tribune
Published October 4, 2013 3:17 pm
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
     
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment
Read All Comments
A federal judge in Nevada has struck down an attempt by regulators to delay proceedings in a civil lawsuit against St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson because of the government shutdown.
U.S. District Judge Miranda Du said the government had brought the case against Johnson, his online marketing company I Works and others associated with him and had an obligation to pursue it.
She said a stay would upset this month's scheduled questioning of experts and could hurt the defendants as well as the consumers Johnson allegedly defrauded.
The Federal Trade Commission requested the stay because of the shutdown, saying its attorneys were barred from working.
A criminal case in Salt Lake City against Johnson — a central figure in the scandal enveloping Utah Attorney General John Swallow — is proceeding, though nothing is scheduled until January.
Tom Harvey

Prosecutorial misconduct issue raised again in Jeremy Johnson case

Prosecutorial misconduct issue raised again in Jeremy Johnson case
Court • Judge says issue should be dealt with through proper procedures.
By Tom Harvey The Salt Lake Tribune
Published September 5, 2013 5:16 pm
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
     
Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment
Read All Comments
An attorney in the criminal fraud case against St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson and four of his employees alleged Thursday that a federal prosecutor may have been withholding evidence from the defense.
Marcus Mumford, one of the attorneys defending an employee of Johnson's I Works company, told a federal magistrate judge that he was concerned that Assistant U.S. Attorney Brent Ward had cut off a potential witness during a deposition when the witness revealed she had provided prosecutors with boxes of evidence, copies of which had not been turned over to defense attorneys.
"I understand he actually instructed a witness not to answer a question that was asked of her for what I understand was for no other reason than it would reveal to attorneys of the company that there were boxes of documents turned over that were not actually produced [to the defense]," Mumford said.
The remark during a hearing in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City followed other complaints about Ward's handling of the case from Johnson, who has waged a campaign against prosecutors and investigators through websites, social media and the news media that accuses them of misconduct.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Warner told Mumford if he believed there had been misconduct he should spell out his concerns in the form of a motion.
"There are ways to raise issues of prosecutorial misconduct," said the judge, who has issued a gag order against the attorneys, Johnson and the others prohibiting them from speaking or posting information publicly about the case.
Johnson, I Works and others were sued by the Federal Trade Commission in December 2010 for allegedly failing to properly disclose charges and using false advertisements to entice online consumers to buy information on "make-money schemes" and "stay-healthy programs" and how to obtain government and private grants.
He was hit with a single criminal charges in 2011 but a new indictment was handed up earlier this year with 86 charges against Johnson and four others after a plea bargain agreement stalled.
The Thursday hearing mostly involved issues of when prosecutors would turn over more evidence to defense attorneys and in what form. But Warner said the high-profile case was not yet ripe enough to set a trial date and instead scheduled another hearing for January.
Mumford's complaint concerned Ward's actions during a deposition of a witness in the civil case pending against Johnson, I Works and others in Las Vegas.
Prosecutors and investigators pursuing the bank fraud, money laundering and conspiracy charges against Johnson and the four others have been sitting in on depositions with witnesses in the Las Vegas lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission. That case also remains pending and no trial date has been set.
Twitter: @TomHarveySltrib

Jeremy Johnson associates settle FTC lawsuit over I Works of St. George

Jeremy Johnson associates settle FTC lawsuit over I Works of St. George
Deal • Agreement puts restrictions on the duo who did not admit any wrongdoing.
By Tom Harvey The Salt Lake Tribune
Published August 9, 2013 9:09 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
     
Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment
Read All Comments
Two former top employees of St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson have reached settlements with federal regulators in a lawsuit alleging Johnson's I Works company bilked U.S. consumers out of tens of millions of dollars.
Former I Works General Manager Bryce Payne and Kevin Pilon, a former project coordinator, have signed settlement agreements, according to documents in the Federal Trade Commission lawsuit filed in 2010 against I Works in Las Vegas.
They had been accused in the lawsuit of aiding in fraudulent sales and billing tactics for online products such as information on how to get government grants for personal expenses, make-money schemes and stay-healthy programs.
When credit card companies began to cut off I Works accounts because of a large number of chargebacks from consumers, Johnson and others created shell companies that hid their true ownership in order to continue to accept debit and credit cards, according to the lawsuit and criminal charges in Salt Lake City against Johnson, Payne and three others.
Johnson and others have steadfastly denied the allegations and said I Works operated within the laws. Payne said in an email on Thursday that he would like to explain why he couldn't continue fighting the lawsuit but was prohibited from speaking publicly by a gag order in the criminal case. Pilon did not return emails seeking comment.
While Payne and Pilon did not admit to any of the allegations in the lawsuit as part of their settlements, they agreed to a series of restrictions on their future business activities and to forfeit some funds.
In Payne's case, he is prohibited from selling any grant-related product and offering any product through what's called a negative option in which consumers have to specifically opt out before they are billed. He also is not to sell through a so-called "forced upsell" in which a product is bundled with another sale with no opt-out opportunity.
Payne is to pay the FTC $20,000, plus an unspecificed amount from the value in three life insurance policies, his interest in a mutual fund, one gold coin and any interest in an investment company.
Pilon agreed in the future he would not charge a customer without his or her express authorization and that he will not apply for a merchant account at a bank on behalf of a business without being the person who actually controls that entity.
Pilon is to pay the FTC $1,000 and surrender any other funds related to I Works entities.
The settlement has been approved by FTC commissioners but still awaits the judge's signature, said Frank Dorman, a spokesman for the agency. Johnson and 10 other family members and former employees remain part of the lawsuit.
Twitter: @TomHarveySltrib

Jeremy Johnson tried to subpoena John Swallow, feds say

Jeremy Johnson tried to subpoena John Swallow, feds say
Jeremy Johnson • Allegation comes in response to I Works founder's court filing.
By Tom Harvey The Salt Lake Tribune
Published May 14, 2013 6:49 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
     
Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment
Read All Comments
Jeremy Johnson is intimidating witnesses and trying to drag John Swallow into a civil lawsuit to which Utah's embattled attorney general apparently has no connection, prosecutors pursuing criminal charges against the St. George businessman asserted Monday.
In their latest court filing, federal prosecutors in Utah also denied Johnson's allegation that the chief prosecutor in his criminal case was willing to strike a deal to protect Swallow from possible prosecution.
The back-and-forth accusations come as the cases against Johnson — a Federal Trade Commission suit in Las Vegas and 86 criminal counts in Salt Lake City — have blended into each other and muddied both matters.
The U.S. Attorney's Office for Utah has asked the judge in the Nevada case to restrict Johnson and co-defendants from interviewing witnesses in the lawsuit until the criminal action wraps up.
Johnson and other defendants have argued that would deny them their right to battle the FTC, which persuaded the court when the suit was filed in December 2010 to freeze all their assets along with those of Johnson's online marketing company I Works.
But in a reply filed late Monday, assistant U.S. Attorney Jeannette Swent said that in representing himself Johnson already was intimidating people involved in the civil case who were potential witnesses in the criminal matter, including a former I Works employee named Devan Partridge.
"Jeremy Johnson used the threat of a deposition subpoena, among other tactics, to threaten and intimidate Devan Partridge and to influence his testimony," Swent wrote.
Johnson has even tried to subpoena Swallow for a deposition, though the attorney general "seems entirely irrelevant to the civil case," Swent wrote. "Mr. Johnson may believe that Mr. Swallow's testimony is relevant to the criminal case, but he should not be allowed to use civil discovery to build his criminal defense."
Johnson, who is under a judge's admonition not to talk to the news media, declined comment.
But in a December 2012 email exchange with Swallow's attorney, Rod Snow, regarding a possible affidavit from Swallow about I Works, Johnson wrote: "John was very familiar with I Works and myself as its owner."
Johnson has embroiled Swallow in an ongoing scandal by accusing him of helping to broker payoffs to enlist the aid of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in blunting the FTC probe of I Works. Swallow has said he only connected Johnson with another businessman with experience in lobbying in Washington.
In opposing prosecutors' efforts to halt most evidence gathering in the Nevada lawsuit, Johnson also accused assistant U.S. Attorney Brent Ward, the chief prosecutor in his criminal case, of agreeing to protect Swallow from prosecution as part of a plea deal that eventually unraveled. Johnson said Ward was a friend and political supporter of Swallow.
Those claims are "spuriously" offered, the government argued, and Johnson has told the news media that prosecutors, in fact, had refused to offer protection to Swallow. The Justice Department is investigating Swallow.
A hearing on the government's motion is set for June 3 in Las Vegas. thavey@sltrib.com
Twitter: @TomHarveySltrib —
Join us for a Trib Talk chat
Reporters Robert Gehrke and Tom Harvey will join Trib Talk host Jennifer Napier-Pearce for a behind-the-scenes look at the ethics controversy involving Utah Attorney General John Swallow and former AG Mark Shurtleff. Visit sltrib. com Tuesday at 11 a.m. for the live video chat.

Feds delay new indictment against Utah businessman Jeremy Johnson

Feds delay new indictment against Utah businessman Jeremy Johnson
Postpone • Deadline for charges in Jeremy Johnson case now set for March.
By Tom Harvey The Salt Lake Tribune
Published April 22, 2013 2:13 pm
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
     
Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment
Read All Comments
A new criminal indictment of St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson that was due Wednesday has been postponed.
U.S. District Judge David Nuffer agreed to extend the deadline for a new indictment to March 6.
Nuffer had set Wednesday as the date after Johnson and prosecutors failed to complete a plea agreement at a Jan. 11 hearing. That deal could have netted Johnson about 11 years in prison on charges of bank fraud and money laundering.
The plea deal unraveled when Johnson, responding to Nuffer's questions, said he had agreed to plead guilty after prosecutors backed away from threats to indict his family, friends and business associates. Then Johnson produced two lists of people whom he said prosecutors had promised not to indict and that the judge wanted to make part of the official record. Prosecutors agreed to the first list, which had been part of their PowerPoint presentation to Johnson and his attorney, but they apparently balked at the second, which contained the name of new Utah Attorney General John Swallow.
Johnson has alleged, at times, that Swallow, while working as the state's chief deputy attorney general, helped broker payoffs to enlist the aid of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in derailing a Federal Trade Commission investigation of Johnson's I Works business.
Swallow and Reid have denied the allegations. The U.S. Attorney's Office is investigating.
The FTC first sued Johnson and I Works in December 2010, alleging the company baited online consumers with small fees for products such as a CD on how to get government grants for personal expenses and then charged their credit or debit cards unauthorized monthly fees.
Johnson then was charged in June 2011 with felony mail fraud stemming from his operation of I Works. Prosecutors said new charges would be forthcoming with the failure of the plea deal, which had included two new charges and the dropping of the original indictment.
Twitter: @TomHarveySltrib